Follow us on:

Twitter YouTube


Send to

Send to friends





Text size:

Text Size - Small Text Size - Normal Text Size - Large

Our proposals

In January 2016, we applied for consent to build a new 400 kV overhead line connection between Richborough and Canterbury. This is needed to join Nemo Link® (an electricity link between Herdersbrug in Bruges and Richborough, near Sandwich in the UK) to our high voltage electricity network. New connections like this are vital to ensure the country has a safe, reliable and secure electricity supply to keep the lights on.

Over the last six months, a panel of four inspectors (the Examining Authority) appointed by the Planning Inspectorate (the Government Agency responsible for nationally significant infrastructure project planning applications) has examined our application. As part of this process, a series of hearings took place, where stakeholders, landowners, tenants and members of the public provided feedback on our application.

The examination process has now come to an end and we would like to thank everyone for their feedback during this process and for giving us your views since the start of the project. You can find full details of our application, including copies of all of our studies, reports, and maps on the Planning Inspectorate’s website: You can find audio transcripts of the hearings and all of the examination documents.

A new connection is required to join the Nemo Link® at Richborough to our high-voltage electricity network and we are developing proposals to do this. These pages explain our previous announcements, and our current thinking.

  • Ways of making the connection outlines the first stage of our work, where we looked at how to connect the Nemo Link to National Grid’s existing high voltage network. 
  • Identifying route corridors explains how we looked at two areas of land (which we called the North Corridor and South Corridor) through which a connection could be built.
  • Route corridor sub-options explains the three options we considered for the western end of the North Corridor and why we have chosen sub-option B.
  • Our preferred route corridor explains our decision to develop proposals for an overhead connection in the North Corridor.
  • Our proposed route outlines the route we carried out formal consultation on in February/March 2015.
  • Our submission route provides information about our Development Consent Order (DCO) application to The Planning Inspectorate.
  • Pylons outlines the types of pylon we propose to use and their location.
  • Placing the connection underground outlines our thoughts on placing the line underground in sensitive areas.